Performance & Injury-Risk Intelligence
Spandrel is a boutique performance-intelligence firm: we integrate training, movement, load, and clinical context into decision-ready outputs—so athletes and staff stop guessing and start governing risk.
When performance decisions stay unclear, risk accumulates silently.
In many environments, the information exists—but it remains fragmented: training structure in one place, rehab notes in another, video in another, and staff intuition in the middle. The result is recurring uncertainty:
-
What exposures are safe right now?
-
What should progress—and what should regress?
-
What matters most over the next 7–14 days?
-
Who owns each decision, and when is it reviewed?
Spandrel’s role is to turn uncertainty into governance: clear rules, named owners, and review cadence.
A repeatable intelligence process
Step 1 — Assessment / Audit
We reconstruct the situation (history, constraints, exposures) and identify the dominant risk pathways and decision bottlenecks.
Step 2 — Artifacts
We translate conclusions into procurement-legible artifacts: Risk Registry, Decision Rules, and a Week 1–2 First Moves sheet.
Step 3 — Governance (optional)
If conditions are evolving (congestion, recurrence, RTP), we continue as a governance partner—structured interpretation and decision validation under uncertainty.
OFFERS
1
Offer A — Individual Performance & Pain Intelligence Assessment
Best for: persistent/recurrent pain, performance plateaus, recurrence patterns, RTP uncertainty.
Includes: intake + history reconstruction, targeted movement assessment (remote/in-person), integrated report + decision meeting.
2
Offer B — Team & Academy Intelligence Audit
Best for: recurring availability issues, unclear risk drivers, decision friction across staff.
Includes: staff alignment interviews, athlete intake, review of training/medical/availability data, integrated report + staff workshop.
Scope is defined in advance to ensure depth and clarity.
3
Offer C — Ongoing Intelligence Governance
Purpose: structured interpretation and governance as conditions evolve.
Includes: case review cadence, adaptation of training strategy, decision support during congestion/recurrence/RTP.
Our Thinking Process: Athletes' Reports
Best fit
Situations where clarity matters more than opinions
Good fit when
-
The situation is persistent, recurrent, or uncertain.
-
There is willingness to work with decision rules and review cadence.
-
Inputs can be shared (within confidentiality constraints).
Engagement boundaries
-
This is an intelligence process and decision support layer.
-
It complements existing medical and coaching teams.
It is not a monitoring platform, protocol library, or quick opinion service.
